Scattered Lego bricks in front of a partially assembled cube of Legos. A light beige background frames the cube with the rest of the background in black. Illustration by Toma Vagner at
Illustration by <a href="" target="_blank">Toma Vagner</a>

Announcing Rome Formatter

Rome Team

We began a full rewrite of Rome in Rust last year, and we’re excited to announce our first release as a part of this effort with the Rome Formatter, a new formatter for JavaScript and TypeScript. It perfectly expresses our goals of excellent performance, ease-of-use, and first-class IDE integration.

Prettier revolutionized the JavaScript ecosystem by normalizing standards and removing formatting discussions. Teams can more effectively review code, developers don’t need to address formatting nits, and the barrier to onboarding into a codebase is reduced.

With our new formatter, we made sure to focus on ease of adoption. We know most users already use Prettier to format their code. Therefore, we decided to embrace Prettier’s styling decisions as much as possible. While this has been the goal, we can’t guarantee perfect Prettier compatibility. We plan on doing additional work in the future to reach Prettier compatibility, and to document any purposeful deviations from Prettier.

You can try out our formatter by installing our Visual Studio Code extension. We also have a CLI in an early alpha state that you can learn about in our getting started guide.

Error Recovery

For each part of Rome that we build, we want to make sure it can stand on it’s own. There’s no benefit in making Rome do everything, if every piece ends up being worse than the alternatives.

For this reason, we took a critical look at how we could improve upon formatting with our unique architecture. One feature that largely stood out was IDE integration.

We wanted our formatter to be like any other tool in your IDE. One particular characteristic of IDEs is that they’re very good at error recovery. Even if you have a syntax error on line 5, the IDE still provides highlighting and code fixes on line 15. With existing formatters such as Prettier, this is not the case. One single syntax error can hold up formatting for the rest of the code.

We wanted to change that. Therefore, it was really important to us that the formatter work with incorrect code. We put a lot of work into building an error tolerant JavaScript/TypeScript parser that could quickly recover from errors, and then extending our formatter to work on this broken code. That way, no matter how many syntax errors in your code, our formatter could still make it look better.

Formatting TypeScript code with a syntax error

We’re still refining our formatter’s error recovery, so we made it an opt-in feature for the first release. Feel free to try it out and give us some feedback. In the future we plan on having it on by default.

We plan on building upon this recoverable parser in the future to bring even more innovative features to your development workflow.


Another significant advantage that stands out over other JavaScript-based developer tools is performance. While there’s an inherent speed increase from switching to a lower level language like Rust, we’ve focused on performance every step of the way. It’s essential that we have a lean core to base future functionality.

It’s very common for developers to have a git hook or continuous integration workflow that verifies that their repository is correctly formatted. For existing JavaScript formatters such as Prettier, this can take over 30 seconds on a top computer!

With a Docker container on a continuous integration workflow, this can be even longer. Nobody likes waiting for CI to finish. It disrupts your flow, wasting time and energy, not to mention running up your AWS or GCP bill.

As a quick example of Rome Formatter’s performance, we decided to compare it to Prettier, by formatting some large open source projects such as ESLint, Webpack, and TypeScript on an M1 Macbook Air with 8GB of RAM 1. We found that formatting with Rome is 9-12x faster than formatting with Prettier.

Bar graph comparing Prettier and Rome performance in formatting the ESLint, Webpack and TypeScript compiler codebases. For ESLint, Prettier is at 5.1 seconds while Rome is at 0.4 seconds. For Webpack, Prettier is at 6.9 seconds and Rome is at 0.74 seconds. For TypeScript, Prettier is at 30 seconds while Rome is at 2.8 seconds

Benchmarks of formatting popular open source repositories, lower is better

More Coming

And of course, this is just the beginning. We’re going to expand the formatter to capture all the different languages we use in web development, such as CSS, HTML, JSON, etc. We also plan on announcing some new products in the near future. If you’re interested in joining our mission, we’re hiring. Stay tuned!


  1. A quick cautionary note, we are not running a proper statistically rigorous setup like However, we believe that these numbers are an accurate representation of the performance you will experience. We plan on providing more rigorous benchmarks in the future and introducing performance regression testing.